Socialist Organiser

The weekly of the fused Workers Socialist League, July 1981 to April 1984

[If you agree with what we have to…]

Socialist Organiser no. 106, 28 October 1982 · scan pp. 14–15 · about 230 words

Read it in the scan (PDF), scan page 14 →

Read from the scan by machine and not corrected: expect misread words, and now and then a caption or a line from a neighbouring story. For anything you quote, read the scan.

Scan page 14

If you agree with what we have to say, you can help. Become a supporter of the Socialist Organiser Alliance -groups are established in most large for more information, write at once Conference flashback: delegates hear of the threat to school meals falling causing an unnecessary safety risk.

The caretakers will be due to attend a reconvened meeting on October 29 to consider any deal which might have been cobbled together between the fulltime oîficials and the Council (Informed sources suggest that the Council is now ready to back down and reinstate the duties under a different guise).

If they are to avoid a very real wage cut, it is clear that the caretakers should reject any offer which does not restore the • weekend boiler duties.

The alternative to behind the scenes wheeling and dealing has to be a return to the original action of refusing to operate boilers on which the necessary safety checks have not been carried out.

The Council's threat of suspensions must be met with a total walk-out if a single suspension notice is actually issued.

Kevin Feintuck Socialist Organiser is not just a We fight to organise workers struggle for a new leadership labour movement.

towns.

To 'Get Organised' in the fight, us at 28 Middle Lane, London N8. Name .

Address paper. in the in the

Scan page 15

vationa talks on 106 October

← Contents of Socialist Organiser no. 106

Something wrong on this page? Tell us →